Tag Archives: anti-Redskins

NFL16 Cherry Picks W11: Pax Patriotana, Caesar Trumpus, Mamarazzi & the Demigoths

15 Nov

I started cutting my political teeth way back in 1968.

I remember the year because it was an event, a national tragedy that began the process: The assassination of Bobby Kennedy (d. 6.6.68), younger brother and AG of slain President John Kennedy (d. 11.22.63), who, after that dreadful day in Dallas, would go on to become Senator from New York and then Democratic presidential candidate, at a rally in the Ambassador Hotel, Los Angeles.

I can’t say any news outside the home, no matter its import, could’ve shook my young world at age six. But upon hearing the shocking report, my older brothers had headed over to the Humphrey – Muskie headquarters somewhere on the North Shore of Chicago, to throw their support behind the next most viable opponent of GOP front-runner, Richard Nixon. When they returned they had a cachet of campaign buttons, a few of which ended up in my tiny hands, along with a bumper sticker which still reads: “McCarthy Supporters Now For Humphrey.”

kennedys-wc-1-29-61-c-stoughton-626kAs for the turbulent Democratic convention about ten miles south, a ruckus that started in the streets and probably sealed the win for Nixon, I didn’t have a clue. Tooth enamel’s tough stuff.

It’s funny how a single event or piece of political paraphernalia, as ephemeral as it may be, can shape one’s life. I’ve had an interest in politics bordering on passion ever since. And, by jove, still have the mementos from that oh-so sad, significant day.

When my baby teeth fell out, I started to cutting the permanents.

I devoured my share of “heaping helping(s)” of empty TV calories for sure (Josie and the Pussycats, Gilligan’s Island, etc.) but ate up good servings of brain food in The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show, The Electric Company (1971), ABC Wide World of Sports and the evening news delivered by legends like Cronkite, Brinkley, Reasoner, Huntley, Walters and Chancellor.

And it was Parker Brothers and their board-game Landslide (1971) that gave me hands-on experience with the electoral college and how presidential campaigns must roll their own dice in strategizing on the States. My teeth were sharpening, though, my friend Tom who owned the board game must’ve had a Trump skill-set because he out-tallied me every time. Gotta’ romance those swing States.

But that passion turned downright frigid in lead-up to 2016’s election day.

Not a big fan of Donald or Hillary, I will, nonetheless, honor the November 8th win, respect the authority of Office and hope for the best, in opposite of that .00003174% of Americans, including LeBron James, Gregg Popovich (“sick to my stomach”) & Steve Kerr who’ve chosen to ‘take their ball and run home’ because they didn‘t like the result. Best advice for the Neo-Visigoths: Find a copy of Edward Everett Hale’s ‘The Man Without a Country (1863)’ and read in deep.

Clearly, the campaign to win and then keep basketball player’s “hearts and minds” is a never-ending effort for the NBA coach. So much for trust, eh? Ugh.

clinton-6-10-16-pp-wc-11-2m-l-shaullAnd Hillary Clinton is no loser.

Taking the popular vote is champion and aught win the White House in a democracy. But unlike Al Gore in 2000, whose loss of Florida’s electors constituted the biggest heist job in American history, with the DC Robes as accomplices after-the-fact (Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98), Ms. Clinton never came close to taking the college kitty. In short, the lady blew her chance.

But that doesn’t make her a mascot to suffer the mamarazzi.

Reference to Margo Gerster who, with baby-on-back, cornered Hill on a nature walk two days after the draining election, thinking it proper to void Hillary’s (& Bill’s) privacy to solicit a Facebook moment (What’s HC gonna’ do, tell mom to take a hike?), an image widely disseminated soon thereafter, finding CBS (“Hiker Crosses Paths”), CNN (Erin Burnett) and whomever else feeds the faux pas. Bad play, ladies. And where were the Secret Service? But I’m not surprised.

At first blush the electoral college appears antiquated, anti-democracy and whenever it veers off from the popular vote, always ends in GOP hands.

But a historical tidbit unbeknownst to Demigoths and the normally insightful Bill Maher, the EC is a test the Founders necessitated that a deserving candidate must pass, a test still relevant. The winner must possess the savvy, the wherewithal in mastering the map to sway voters State-by-State, and in the process acquiring a healthy respect for the union that is this United (50) States of America.

The first black president seems now an entitlement, the first female Commander-in-Chief knowing she must, in famous words of John Houseman, “eeeearn it.”

obama-trump-11-10-16-jesusemen-oni-voa-119kThe former First Lady lost the election long before the elector test or her “deplorable” line and had nearly nothing to do with any FBI commentary. In failing to distinguish herself from her former boss, President Barack Obama, majority voters in key States made a statement: ‘Not tough enough, and not again, or for awhile, anyway.’

Most Americans had high hopes when the first minority took up residence in the White House in 2009. Obama was short on experience, seemed, apart from the birth certificate confusion, almost too perfect for the post and resorted to his own form of flippancy when topics got hot, but his ready smile gave assurance and he seemed eager to take on the big challenges that awaited.

Obama will be remembered for four actions: 1) Brokering the deal with America’s healthcare “monster(s)” to create Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (NFIB (2012)), costing greedmeisters next to nothing yet heaping much of the tax burden upon the middle-class (contra-FDR); 2) advising on capture / execution of 9-11 designer, terrorist Osama bin Laden (2011); 3) taking sides in the Trayvon Martin – George Zimmerman incident (2013) (“Martin could’ve been me 35 years ago”) after attacker Martin died of a gunshot fired by block watch volunteer Zimmerman who claimed self-defense, was charged and then acquitted, and 4) picking his NCAA basketball tourney bracket selections come March Madness.

Unfortunately, on the one issue that Obama was particularly well-suited to keep moving the nation forward, race-relations, he has instead presided over what can be called a period of race regression, a sorry state not seen since Reagan-Bush.

As for Donald, he’s sharp as a tack, has energy and an undeniable charisma, a pride in his person and nation and a certain maverickness that McCain the Senator never displayed, a trait lacking in Presidents for quite a spell (LBJ). But his anti-choice stand feels political, must check his habit to flippancy (global warming) and his disdain for regulation (Dodd-Frank), market-place competition and American jobs (monopolist) bespeaks of a boyish greed potentially more disastrous economically than Ronald Reagan’s trickle-down goof.

trump-wc-11-9-16-transition2017-450kMost troubling is that neither candidate exhibited the foresight, honesty, courage to put the voters to a test in self-sacrifice (“ask what you can do for your country (JFK)”), a national unifier if there ever was one. No measurable progress happens without it.

It’d be analogous to Roger Goodell having chutzpah to ditch pink-wear in favor of a field-friendly color for all cancer victims and research (dark green), to use his bully-pulpit to force NFLPA to institute serious PED-testing or to tell NFL fans and sport scribes who curry favor to stop the incessant whine on game officiating come each “Monday morning.” Ugh.

So what does Trump-the-President mean for the NFL and its fandom?

A President, no matter the political party, usually has little impact on League operations or policy. But if a particular Commander-in-Chief has a real interest in the gridiron game, any comments he makes will make news.

And this president-elect might actually have an interest.

President Obama put on a good show, giving warm congratulatory speeches in welcome to a steady stream of title teams that now visit the White House for one more pat-on-their-collective back. But while he’s a love for the links, Barack appears to have no interest in the combative sports (+b-ball). And though he lacks the competitive spirit that led the Kennedys to engage the pigskin for some lawn version touch-football, Don clearly has a curiosity for the National game.

Which toggles four sport topics on Trump: 1) The future of White House pep-rallies now that monarchial King LeBron has given thumbs-down with Trump-soon in residence; 2) What NFL team does Donald Trump favor; 3) how happy is Redskins owner Dan Snyder today, and 4) will the President-elect and his immigration blueprint alter future NFL – Mexico game plans?

redskins-chiefzee-wc-2-4m-k-allison-1-10-16Since the 1970s America’s seen a prodigious growth in sporting endeavors, champions of which nearly all seem to find their way to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. So was born a new tradition that’s become about as tired as the never-ending supply of Law & Order reruns, diverting CICs from pressing duties or the down-time that a President must take to keep sound in mind & body in the most stressful job on Earth. Time then the custom gave way to common sense and got terminated by the new Prez. As Trump doesn’t need another reason to tick-off female Dems in cancelling only the less-popular women’s visits, if it happens (sure), expect him to can the whole kit n’ kaboodle.

Who’s Trump’s top NFL team? A New Yorker, he may be a Giants, Jets or Bills fan. If his ties to Bill Belichick and Tom Brady are sincere, it’s good chance he’s Foxborough friendly. Like Barack, he’s always working an angle so it’s hard to get a read. If it is the Pats, Don’s hitching his wagon to arguably the greatest pro football dynasty in history. In 2016, the Cowboys believe, Carroll’s crew never quits, Big Ben’s 5-star field general, John Harbaugh mastered the pros and Bruce Arians coaches the Cards, but it’s New England, with their rare loss (SEA 11.13), that remains Empire’s standard.

To the Washington Redskins and their war-in-defense of their 82 yr. old moniker against a niche effort spearheaded by Oneida’s Ray Halbritter and taken up in 2012 by johnny-come-latelies in corporate kids-for-change, malleable media, Democrat elite, a smattering of celebs and the Washington Post whose polling reported “9 of 10” aboriginal Americans are not offended by the motif, a new President in Republicrat Trump will undoubtedly lead to a more sensible, honest directive given the Department of Commerce and its Patent & Trademark Office. Court cases are pending but it’s likely this and other PC-appeasing stands taken by Dems held some sway over mod-voters in swingers. It didn’t help, anyway.

As for the impact the recent American election will have on the NFL – Mexico business relationship, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell will publicly downplay its significance but if a border-wall does become reality (doubtful), it’s hard to imagine its continuation. It will be interesting to see if Texans v. Raiders MNF game will out-draw the last record-setting NFLM meet in 2005 between Arizona and San Francisco which drew 103,000+ at Estadio Azteca.

cherries-wc-cca-b-kua-6-1-08-3-3mCherry Picks Week 11: Thank goodness for the spread

Saints (4-5) @ Carolina (3-6): 11.17 NBC 8:30: NO wins
Ravens (5-4) @ Dallas (8-1): 11.20 CBS 1:00: BAL wins
Jacksonville (2-7) @ Lions (5-4): CBS 1:00: Lions win
Tennessee Titans (5-4) @ Indianapolis Colts (4-5): CBS 1:00: Indy wins
Buffalo Bills (4-5) @ Cincinnati Bengals (3-5-1): Fox 1:00: Bengals win
Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-5) @ Kansas City Chiefs: Fox 1:00: Chiefs win
Arizona Cardinals (4-4-1) @ Minnesota Vikings (5-4): Fox 1:00: Cards win
Miami Dolphins (5-4) @ Los Angeles Rams (4-5): Fox 4:05: Dolphins wins
Philadelphia (5-4) @ Seattle Seahawks (6-2-1): CBS 4:25: Seahawks win
Green Bay Pack (4-5) @ Washington Redskins (5-3-1): NBC 8:30: GB wins
Houston Texans (6-3) @ Oakland (Mex): 11.21 Disney 8:30: Houston wins

Record: 45 – 51 -2

......NFL-symbol.wikiproject.6kbSteven Keys
NFL HunchLine
Photo credit: B.Belichick, wc.cca, K.Allison, 8.28.9; Kennedys, wc, C.Stoughton, 1.29.61; H.Clinton, wc, 6.10.16, PlannedParenthood, L.Shaull; Trump-Obama, wc, 11.10.16, Jesusemen-Oni.VOA; D.Trump, wc, Transition2017, 11.9.16; M.Trump-M.Obama, theWhiteHouse, wc, 11.10.16; ChiefZee, Redskins-DC, K.Allison, 1.10.16, wc; cherries, wc, B.Kua, 6.1.08; NFL-symbol, wikiproject
Posted: 11.15.16 @ 2:34pm, edit @ 11:36 EST; Copyright © 2016

Advertisements

NFL16: Red-Doggin’ the Media’s Roger Goodell Ruse

1 Aug

Ensconced in Boom

He’s become the whipping-boy of nearly every online editor & scribe in the land, a terrain now populated with more apps, acronyms (sabrmetrics), video & mock drafts than you can shake a latté stir-stick at, or, put another way, than there are sleazy storylines in a Taboola – Outbrain booby box that blight the bottom of every endless page.

Who‘s the poor chap? NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, that’s who.

With the 2016-17 kickoff slated for early September (9.8), matching February finalists Carolina and Denver, the Jamestown, New York native and Paul Tagliabue successor (‘06) will embark on his 2nd decade at the helm of America’s most popular & profitable wingding value (1920), not including vacation – conference destinations (Las Vegas / Chicago) and gastro-addictions (sugar).

.........Clifford.reddog.4.1.6.DoD.thm.wcAnyone who fancies him / herself to be that hip, happening kinda’ sportswriter, the one who loathes greedy owners but imagines a special kinship with the jocks as if in another life they’re more likely to be a 1st-round draft choice slingin’ TDs than hangin’ out on the yacht with the blue bloods, rags on Roger with a regularity rivaling today’s Pavlovian hand-held habits.

Which is funny because most of the higher paid scribes in pursuit of that journalism B.A. probably pledged on the same Greek row as did most of those money-maniacal NFL owners. Oh well, who’s always consistent anyway?

When that idea well runs dry, when you’ve already posted your position and all-time greatest rankings for the week or when you just want to release some pent-up frustration, not to worry, there’s always good ol’ smiling Roger Goodell to “kick around” in your column.

So why all the hate for just another rich guy, one of the 2% who run the world and keep us gerbils running on that consumer treadmill?

Maybe because Roger’s standing in the way, i.e., the friends (RG) of my enemies (Snyder) are my enemies, you might say.

Most of the griping on Goodell, which invariably leads to the feeble claim his job is in jeopardy and what a fine replacement so-n-so would make, is illusory, likely a ruse to cover the real purpose: Get a new Commissioner, check-mate Dan Snyder and get his beloved Redskins motif bounced outta’ the League.

A kooky call? The best heist is always an inside job.

Business As Usual

Nobody really expected that the NFL would make a determination on whether or not Peyton Manning actually used PEDs that were reported last fall to have been subject of a home delivered parcel to his wife Ashley a few years back.

.........Manning.wc.thm.3.1.13.Sgt.B.Peterson.USO.USMCUnless the lordly one had been giving blood samples in a testing protocol at the time of the package’s believed arrival (nyet) and that every molecule of said PED supply was tagged, tracked and accounted for, there was no possible way for any inquiry to make a sustainable determination, fact finding or certain conclusion on whether Pey-Dirt did or did not in fact partake in the prohibited performance enhancers his wife was reported to have received by mail.

That the Manning household did or did not receive the package in question was easy enough to establish by parcel company records which questioning (under oath?) could verify. But the usage question, i.e., who, how much and when, if such package was accepted, would necessarily remain open-ended, a dark cloud hanging overhead the SB50’s winning QB.

So when the League released statement earlier this week (7.27) clearing Peyton, claiming to’ve concluded, found that Manning did not use subject PEDs, it threw most of us for a loss, throwing a flag on the play.

On that day Roger finally does hang up his Commissioner’s key, this funny finding will rank near the top as one of his poorest calls and should rightly earn him a small, swift kick in the shin (figuratively speaking) like the one little Kurt Russell gave Elvis Presley (It Happened At the World’s Fair (‘63)). Ouch!

.......package.emojione.12.21.15.wc.thmThe special handling shown Peyton, Broncos & GM John ‘I ain’t playing in Baltimore’ Elway and the League (SB validation), in opposite of a just but max penalty meted-out in Deflategate, smacks of favoritism, standard dilution and no small amount of arrogance for thinking fans would swallow the ‘strange brew.’

Should this awkward result and curious Commissioning work a black mark on Goodell‘s record? As it would’ve been nearly impossible, were Peyton to have in fact engaged the suspected PED supply, that any evidence of their use could’ve been obtained (short of a Manning admission), NFL’s silly extension of that state to a finding of innocence speaks more to misguided policy than corruption. If we fired everyone for making a bad call, 90% of the nation’s jobs would come open within the week.

65 Clifford Red Dog Trap

Because last May’s Washington Post poll (90% of aboriginal Americans are not offended by Redskins’ motif, < 10% answered yes) has not swayed the bully bunch to the side of public opinion, even as that revelation makes any sort of vote seem likely to just amplify its findings, and then that the legal process can only end up in one place (SC) where its current moderate but conservative-leaning majority bodes well for Dan Snyder’s embattled trademark, it’s now imperative for the anti-Redskins side to create a turnover.

When the PC playbook flops (nobody likes a bully) what’s the Coach to do? Call the old red dog (blitz), that’s what, and take out the QB. Hello, Roger.

.......Clifford.reddog.wc.WH-L.Bush.4.9.7.S.Craighead.thmThe media mantra to oust Goodell actually began taking discernable shape in 2012 (See; Nike NFL) and might just be masquerading under a different banner as another ‘means to an end’ to get that Redskins logo retired.

Readers might say (I‘m an optimist), ‘Stevo, c’mon, remember Bountygate, the Rice – Palmer incident and Deflategate? Those are the reasons why Roger Goodell is in bad with most everybody.’ Wrong.

I remember the 2010 NFCC, subject for Bountygate. Still cringe at the over-unders Saints defenders laid on Brett Favre, the most exciting QB since Namath & Staubach laced ‘em up, the 2d ambush perpetrated post-Warner the week prior. In truth, most ‘everybody’ was fine with the bans Goodell handed those sorry Saints in question, excepting the homers and a federal jurist, of course.

The knockout punch Rice put on fiancée Palmer in 2014, it’s etched in the mind, thanks to the sleazoids at TMZ whose video drop inflamed the story to a state where Roger, who hit no one, took more flak than the crook. And while I’m on the topic, why does SAS’y still have his job (“don’t provoke”)? Right, it’s Disney.

And if there was an 11th Commandment it could’ve read like this: Thou shalt not impede an on-going investigation, even if thy sandals hurt or the sheep & sand are driving you crazy. Tom Terrific destroyed his cell phone in the Deflategate audit. Not so terrific. Penalty fits the misdeed. Besides, real Pats fans aren’t losing sleep. They know Tom benefits from the extended R&R (18y).

.......Silver.11.21.14.K.Allison.wc.thmbThe dubious effort to remove Roger stands about as much chance of success as the Vikings’ new US Bank Stadium does of going the entire 2016-17 season without a glitch. Why make the lines simple and construction cool (outdoors) when you can complicate it and beg for problems? Ask the rich guy (Zygi Wilf).

One can’t really think a Commissioner should be treasured anyway, unless one has just ‘fallen off’ that proverbial ‘turnip truck,’ or favors an asylum, so to speak, one that’s run by the trustees (players).

As for the NBA Commissioner, the standard is gold, not Silver.

Ousting an owner in dementia (Sterling) whose babble is secretly taped in-home and moving an All Star game that pulls in about as many viewers as Lone Ranger re-runs from a State whose political majority has gone “extreme,” well, those aren’t exactly tough calls. Add in what appears a lack of concern over the dicey co-mingle of sport & gambling and you’ve got nearly no standard at all.

Back to Roger.

They don’t pay the man enough. Big money must be great ($40M) but you can’t take it with you. Oxidative stress is America’s #1 health concern.

Other jobs are stressful but even the President of the United States, with all the important hats the Chief Executive must wear, does not suffer the vilification from press and army of anonymous trolls as does this Commissioner.

But Raja’s got some backers:

......Nooyi.wc.1.23.8.thm.Davos.WEF1) Owners: Roger’s been so good for the Big Wheels, growing buyers & revenue sources, that he’s moved into Rozelle territory, the man who made the NFL America’s #2 religion and the only one showing a growth spurt;

2) Fans: Put aside grudge-holders (NE, NO, etc.) and online nasty-boys and 9 of 10 fans (all genders) are practically jumping outta’ their skin for September kickoff. That’s called customer satisfaction;

3) Sponsors: Their resilience in face of anti-Redskins flash-mob has been nothing short of amazing. Usually as skittish as a major sportswriter, the Suits & Skirts (Indra Nooyi (PepsiCo)) have backed Dan & Roger to the goal-line, show no sign of buckling and have absolutely no interest in validating a racist logo.

And the players, their opinion on Goodell will turn on who asks the question, how it’s framed, respondent’s length of NFL tenure and assurance of anonymity.

NFLPA members are naturally suspicious of those sitting across the table in CBA negotiation. But they’re no dummies and make their choices, i.e., assumption of risk (concussion) for big benefits incurred. Most appreciate the challenges RG faces in his many duties, including DD greeter and disciplinarian who must enforce rules to ensure NFL viability and their own job success as rosterees.

The red-dog tactic will not take down Roger Goodell. He’s got a stout offensive line and even with a furious on-rush he won’t rabbit. No run-QB, Goodell’s a mobile-manager who matriculates with the best of ‘em and likely will remain under center, suffering the “slings and arrows” of a petulant and perfidious press as long as he enjoys suiting up for the action.

......NFL-symbol.wikiproject.6kbSteven Keys
NFL HunchLine
Photo Credit: R.Goodell, wc.cca, 8.30.12, SSG-T.Wade, USMA; Clifford-RedDog, wc.cca, 4.1.6, DoD; P.Manning, USO-USMC, wc.cca, 3.1.13, Sgt-B.Peterson; package, emojione-project, wc.cca, 12.21.15; Clifford-RedDog, WH-L.Bush, 4.9.7, S.Craighead; A.Silver, wc.cca, 11.21.14, K.Allison; I.Nooyi, wc.cca, PepsiCo, 1.23.8, Davos, WEF; NFL-Wikiproject.
Posted: 8.1.16 @ 10:53am, edit @ 4:45 EST; Copyright © 2016

9 of 10 v. R-word: Redskins Row a New Front in War on Choice

26 Jul

“Politics makes strange bedfellows.”

Charles Dudley Warner, My Summer in a Garden and Calvin, A Study of Character (1870) and Edward de Vere, The Tempest (1590s) (Wikipedia).

— — —

“Surprise, surprise, surprise!”

Ed and Charlie knew what they were writing about. Perceptive Dudes.

Life is full of surprises, oh my gosh: Big and small, short and tall, public and nobody’s business at all.

........Redskins.ChiefZee.wc.2m.12.4.11.Katidid213Sometimes that surprise will result from the most unexpected amalgamations you could imagine, all converging peacefully upon that figurative berth.

Case in point: Meeting of minds these past 4 years in support of NFL’s Washington Redskins more recently embattled but long-standing motif (1932).

Conservatives like Dan Snyder and Don Trump speaking with the same voice, on this topic anyway, as progressives like Dan Rather and Kevin Durant about a bit of commercial art in defiance of the ongoing attack on freedom of choice, or worded another way, personal autonomy of thought.

The merge in mind is a response to the national niche that emerged after the “really big (shoe)” Nike contracted for control of the League’s uniform duties in 2012 (and look how that’s turned out, i.e., Color Rush, Bucs, Browns). It’s when PC promoters took a page outta’ the energy industry’s playbook (no warming) and began fomenting the myth that there was broad resentment on the DC moniker. Make another bed, get The Simpsons sheets.

........Reid&Kagan.wc.5.12.10.48k.OoSfHRCue an epiphany of outrage that burst upon the sporting scene, spearheaded by compliant sport scribes (P.King / D.Banks), self-serving special interest (R.Halbritter (Oneida)), célébrité in bad actors (J.Oliver), positioning politicos (H.Clinton / H.Reid), a mass of soc-media minionry and the bully bandwagon filled-up faster than you can say Jack Robinson. And all stubbornly still holdin’ on tight, even post-Post poll, likely fearful of vexing testy mandate-givers in snobbish defiance of a now vetted Indian consensus while heralding hypocrisy like we’re too dumb to notice most were mute pre-2012 on what they claim a race topic, one that if federally docketed is accorded the strictest of scrutiny.

But sincerity, “fatal” in quantity (O.Wilde), is for saps, right? And what would aboriginal Americans know about Indian sport logos anyway, eh, Harry? Ugh.

PC Battleground: Pro-Choice v. Politically Correct

For pro-choicers, their own entente, a pro-logo alliance fortified by the recent Washington Post poll (May), a serious sampling that threw cold water on hot-headed anti-choicers in merely confirming what most adults, sporting or not, had already known, that Indians (9 of 10) and otherwise are not offended by the moniker in opposite of dictates of NCAA and dictionary boards of editors, has been a curious kinship.

.......anti-abort.wc.1.20.13.B.Stansberry.KX.TN.3mBut while this Redskins ruckus works through Federalia, will remain a political football to kick about (See; P&TO) no matter who wins in November and brings together strangers more inclined to give “kindness” than pain, it may be having the opposite effect on the anti-Redskins contingent.

What looks the new litmus-test for the liberally-inclined may be driving a wedge between New Deal / Frontier – Great Society Dems (moi) and their court-appointed cousins, the politically correct who picket-in-hate (“That’s racist!”) just like the in-your-face (8ft “buffer zone”) anti-abortionists camped at Planned Parenthood, intimidating with selected scripture and blurting bloody “murder!”

One side slips under the covers, metaphorically speaking, cautious but content, the other discovering they’ve been “sleeping with the enemy.”

Talk about “strange bedfellows,” holy headboard, Batman!

“A (Poll) is a (Poll) is a (Poll)”

The Post poll isn’t just a poll, it is the poll. It’s the “mother,” father, grandma, grandpa and ‘old woman who lives in a shoe (1794)’ poll of all logo surveys.

It’s a sampling, claims not otherwise, publicized its method but is likely closest we’ll ever get to eliciting in a national, seemingly neutral, skilled manner the feelings of aboriginal Americans on the issue of Indian sport monikers.

.......Clinton.6.10.16.PP.wc.11.2m.L.ShaullAnd forget about a national plebiscite on word definitions. No interest from either side. Not so crazy a notion, considering we’ll soon cast ballots (if the Diebold® permits) for a President who’s essentially a button-manager (nukes) and ‘yes man (or woman)’ for corporate consumerism. Besides, a vote on Redskins would open a Pandora’s Box. Wouldn’t want our democracy too pure, would we (See; the Fed & Chiefs)?

To dismiss a poll out-of-hand as flawed as some feebly contend when conducted by an entity who was publicly opposed to the motif’s continued use, i.e., no bias, a paper with long record of liberal endorsement and top reporting (Watergate), well, that’s an opposition that can claim only one valuable but potentially abusive attribute on its credit ledger: Power, unchecked variety (Watergate, etc.). In this case, a power that found much of its fuel in the workings of virtuality.

The internet & social media have their upside. But it’s a double-edged sword. The lives of the < 25 set are permeated by gadgetry and their applications. A study at Baylor found college-age users spend about 8 (M) to 10 (F) hours a day on their phones (“The Invisible Addiction” / Roberts – Yaya – Manolis / JoBA / 8.26.14 (cited on Your Health w/Dr. Richard and Cindy Becker)). Where the good doctors got “invisible” from I can’t imagine. Call it the send n’ snub.

.......iPhone.wc.D.Zanetti.3.47mThis addiction to information and communication technologies makes malleable users susceptible to trends. Followers on Facebook, Twitter, countless web boards are swaddled with a sense of community but in its virtual state those cozy covers can be pulled off in an instant when unseen leaders, i.e., site managers, get bored then bulldoze the neighborhood. And yet minds and opinions have already been shaped with little or no time to reflect.

And it’s in that world of trends & texts where the petite anti-Redskins campaign found its footing and will forever forage for converts to feed its big appetite.

More Than Dictum

Sport monikers can invoke themes outside the world of “tumultuous merriment.”

It’s not hard to see how topics like sociology, art, money, history, can be partial basis for their creation and then source for a fuller inquiry in retrospect.

......fan.football.TXA&M.9.3.15.wc.6.46m.CommerceMCPRedskins opponents have been attempting to introduce civil rights onto the scale of justice when pleading and panning the famous Indian portrait.

It’s been my experience in reading through historical usage of redskin that’ve appeared online since the DC motif was put in the cross-hairs, that racial slur rarely reads as intent of writers unless coupled with words like blood-thirsty, savage, heathen and the like, slurs themselves, not redskin. I can’t write to all references posted but identification appears the common if not universal intent in use, just as color words black (Negroid) and white (Caucasoid) do today.

History matters, not so much to recent Presidents who, where education’s topic, are still bear-hugging math & science, but rather, to those who realize answers to societal issues & ills lay often in appreciating the past. While it matters, so too does a balance of relevancy when weighing past or isolated harsh intent against a more current and prolonged purpose, as in how the Redskins name & image have been intended and read by what would appear a super majority of Americans since rostering in 1932: As a positive for over four generations.

That written, one can’t fully appreciate a logo topic and render informed opinion without seeking out an appreciation for the current sport fans’ perspective on such and how, for many, these symbols enrich the experience. And it’s that perspective and its present-day intents (tribute, strength & charm) that should provide assistance to the jurist who presides over an Indian moniker case.

......fans.Saints.wc.9.9.10.USMC.5.8mThe wise and, in some cases, the brave Court ruling will result from the adjudicator(s) having gone beyond the requisite application of the facts to the procedural and substantive law. Some might term this a ‘living’ view as opposed to strict construction of the rules as written. In fact, it would be more akin to simply caring about your job performance and becoming well versed on the material at hand.

Just as a judge will in other actions involving any number of underlying subject matters like…say, medicine or automotive repair, often vest herself with the necessary insight on pertinent skills, sense & standards that are concomitant, she too must walk a mile in the moccasins of the sport aficionado to fully vest in the moniker‘s essence, then discover the truth and see that justice is done.

That’s the legend, anyway.

The last thing America needs in 2016 is another reason to conceive hate. But when avarice & arrogance get underneath the covers it’s four sheets to wind and what’s spawned ain’t pretty. Thankfully, the “village” is big with lots ‘o bunks.

......NFL-symbol.wikiproject.6kbSteven Keys
NFL HunchLine
Photo Credit: anti-abortion, Students-for-Life, UoToronto, 11.17.9, wc.cca; Washington Redskins, Chief.Zee-fans, wc, 12.4.11, Katidid213; H.Reid-E.Kagan, wc, OoSHR, 5.12.10; anti-abortion.walk, KX-TN, 1.20.13, wc, B.Stansberry; H.Clinton, wc, 6.10.16, Planned.Parenthood, L.Shaull; iPhone, wc, D.Zanetti; fans, Saints, 9.9.10, wc, USMC-DoD; NFL-symbol, Wikiproject
Posted: 7.26.16 @ 6:56pm, edit 7.27 @ 5:31pm EST; Copyright © 2016

Jackson Hops Anti-Redskins Bandwagon

10 Nov

Count New York Knickerbockers’ President and former player, coaching titlist Phil Jackson among the celebrities who’ve recently discovered and publicly declared a personal aversion to Dan Snyder and the Washington Redskins 80+ year old motif.

On Monday, Jackson took to Twitter and threw his support behind anti-Redskinites who made a gathering outside TCF Bank Stadium at the University of Minnesota to protest Sunday’s Vikings – Redskins game in hopes of putting a feather in cap of Ray Halbritter Oneida and give boost to Nike plans for revamping the entire NFL logo landscape.

............Redskins.wc.cca.thumb

As the “really big shoooe” might say, change ($) is constant. Cha-ching.

I recall an appearance Jackson made on The Tonight Show some 20 years back when the Zen-meister was then coach at Chicago. What led him to ask, I do not remember, but Jay Leno queried the coach if he listened to Rush Limbaugh and that sort of diatribe. Phil responded, ‘No, I don’t, I’m into rational discourse,’ or something to that affect.

Phil was a different sort in those days. No bandwagoneer, he conveyed an independence of thought that gave him an aura of soulful serenity.

So long Mr. Soulful.

The fact he’s reported to have a history of coloring his locker-room comments w/Indian references makes this recent declaration no less empty when you consider a majority of rank & file tribal membership may support the Redskins moniker but remain un-polled.

Maybe back then I was confusing independence with aloofness.

...........Kerry-windsurfing.thumb

Knicks president might just be one of those people who use their talent for sport only as a means to an end. Call them technicians, akin to saberheads and pandering politicos, aka, John Kerry the wind-surfer (‘04) and President Obama b-ball enthusiast or “hack” golfer. Gotta’ write, Jordan was a little rough on the CIC. Can’t all be baseball stars, eh, Mike?

No more sporting than their Democrat counterparts, Republican celebrities don’t waste too much energy faking it on tumultuous merriment. They do plenty of that elsewhere, like hunting trips (See; Cheney ‘06) and military props (See; GW Bush ‘68 (TNAG)).

............Obama.8.26.09.P.Souza.thumb

What Phil, the anti-Redskins leadership and GOP elite all have in common is that oh-so delightful drive for dinero…mas & mas dinero. Phil is today, first & foremost, a business-man to whom sporting types, fans in particular, are nothing more than consumers.

And that plays right into today’s American marketing credo: servicing youth, the consumer-zombies, and the lowest common denominators (least discerning audience).

Limbaugh, w/help of a deregulated media industry, used radio to disseminate his demagoguery to millions in the 80s. Fox News launched w/satellite TV in the 90s and today, Phil, ESPN, Bill Simmons, Dick Sherman, PCBs (politically correct bullies) and any person or entity who seeks to rouse youthful passions into a figurative call to arms for whatever sale their pitching (logo war) will ride their celebrity on the techno-gadget wave in social media and world wide web.

All cut from the same cloth, just different ends of the bolt.

...........Jackson.1.28.07.M.Sandoval.wc.cca.thmb

Jackson’s anti-Redskins pitch is just the most recent air-ball he’s chucked of late.

His stingy, public denial last summer of the San Antonio Spurs right to the usage of the “dynasty” label was a doozy.

But it’s just one of a handful of recent misfires from the man who’s banked the Knicks’ foreseeable future on the, so far, illiquid Carmelo Anthony account. Time will tell.

For a time I’d believed it was Phil who was the real difference-maker in the Bulls and most recent Lakers’ dynasties. Now I wonder if maybe it was the other way around, that it was Jackson who was just “Hitchin’ a Ride” with Mike and Kobe. New food for thought.

This is definitely the new Phil: brassy. Change is over-rated, if you’re a “human being.”

Steven Keys
Straight Shooter
Photo credits: Jordan – Jackson, S.Lipofsky, wc.cca, 1997; Washington Redskins, wc.cca, 1972; J.Kerry windsurfing; Pres.Obama, 8.26.09, P.Souza – WH, wc.cca;
Posted: 11-9-14 @ 10:51pm; edit 11-10 @ 1:55am EST