Archive | golf RSS feed for this section

NFL16: In Deferring to Dak, Tony Romo Fails the Grit-Test

17 Nov

He didn’t take many questions in Tuesday’s press conference. Instead, Dallas Cowboys starting quarterback for the past decade, Tony Romo, read a statement. He got goods reviews from the press corps and blogisphere bunch.

But place me about 800 yards west of the cheering section.

Grade given by this football fan for Romo’s blood-less abdication: D.

In his oration, Romo deferred to rookie back-up QB Dak Prescott on the starter question: “He’s earned the right to be our quarterback. As hard as that is for me to say he’s earned that right. He’s guided our team to an 8-1 record and that’s hard to do.” Very nice. Maybe too nice.

“Right” schmight. There are no “right(s)” in football, just ethical duties and contract obligations that some players will always meet, some will sometimes, some won’t but on their best day and a few don’t seem to give a damn at all.

romo-10-13-10-bigcatsliar-wc-343kOkay…you say you believe in rights. That should make you a Thomas Jefferson fan (BoR). For the sake of argument, let’s say rights do exist in football. Then I’d say, Tony Romo’s earned a BIGGER right to re-claim his starters job than has Prescott in retaining it, and with ten years of All-Pro play, sound character and seniority, shouldn‘t have to convince his owner of it, not if the Cufflink appreciates loyalty, anyway.

‘Seniority is lame,’ say some, but just wait until you start having to look over your shoulder at the young Turks coming to take your job. It won’t seem so silly then.

And I don’t want to read any hearsay from captured scribes or Cowboys’ brass (Steve Jones) on how Tony supposedly asked politely for his job back. Straight from the horses mouth (TR) or save it. Even if, this you don’t ask, you demand. If you lose the argument you take your lumps and stay a team-player, giving advice / support as needed. But you don’t ask.

And therein lay the wild-card in this hand of high-stakes football.

What would Jerry Jones have done if Tony had pushed hard to get back his starters spot, made an issue of it, would Jones have conceded, admiring the veteran’s moxie and taking it as good sign that maybe now Tony finally has the wherewithal to lead Dallas back to the Super show? Test of tenacity, as it were.

Apparently Romo never pressed the point, never handed in his exam.

Leaders, champions, they don’t defer to hot-streaks, popularity contests or young Tom Brady analogies. The greats will advocate, argue, fight tooth n’ nail for that starters spot and slot-to-glory, with both fists-a- flyin’ if necessary, Ty Cobb style when you had to fight for the right to play. And they did.

prescott-9-18-16-k-allison-187kIf I were Jerry Jones or Jason Garrett I’d likely tab Dak Prescott the starter myself. Stick with the hot hand and healthier frame than the oft-injured Romo.

I wrote, ‘likely.’ I’d need convincing that three good wins (DC, @GB, PHI), one pretty good win (@ PIT (Ben still bunged)), four walkover wins (CHI, SF, CIN, CLE) and one loss (NYG) gives a first-year guy the nod over a 4-time Pro Bowler.

But Tony Romo’s not an owner, he’s not a coach, he’s not Cowboys PR person, he’s not a GM implementing a youth movement or authoring a masters thesis on ‘Diversity and the NFL.’ He’s a man who dresses in shoulder-pads, cleats and rides point for America’s Team, or used to, anyway, the top job on the planet, a man with great passing stats in line for Cowboys’ Ring of Honor but posts a pedestrian playoff mark that raises doubts about his clutch-capability.

A man with that Dallas record and deep well of gridiron knowledge should NOT willingly hand over the starters spot. NEVER. And that’s Tony Romo all over.

From his first year as a starter when he bobbled that FG snap late in a playoff loss v. Seattle in Parcells final season (’06), you wondered about Mr. Romo. The bobble was a blip. Things like that happen. But with Romo it’s always something, something to derail the run. In fairness, Dez did (catch it (See; GB 2015)).

It doesn’t matter that Romo may be the only man in these United States who thinks he should start over an 8-1 rookie. Henry David Thoreau wrote, “any man more right than his neighbors constitutes a majority of one.” Some players, those imbued with spirit of competition and personal achievement, would understand and give their backing. Great quarterbacks have great big egos. They’d better.

jones-12-7-15-k-allison-wc-339kAnd if Romo had been given his job back and his ‘mates had tanked in protest, tanked on the team, tanked on the fans, that’s their problem. You go out with your head held high knowing you’ve done what a leader does: Take charge, give it your best, give it your all until that final gun goes off.

‘But what about the team,’ you say, ‘Dak’s got ’em believing?’ Sure he has, but Romo’s a master-craftsman in the pocket who’s won a playoff game or two, had Dallas believing in prior campaigns and could likely do it again. It’s theory but as sound as the Dak strategy.

I wish Mr. Prescott well. Youth must be served, elections excepted.

As for Tony Romo, I hope you like your Ring-of-Honor ceremony. When you get back to the fairways say ‘hey’ to President Obama and remember this link lesson: Drive for show, put for dough, Canton covets moxie that few come to know.

......NFL-symbol.wikiproject.6kbSteven Keys
NFL HunchLine
Photo credit: T.Romo, wc.cca, 12.7.15, DC, K.Allison; Romo, wc, bigcatsliar, 10.13.10; D.Prescott, wc, 9.18.16, K.Allison; J.Jones, wc, 12.7.15, DC, K.Allison; cherries-cloth, wc, picdrome, 6-2011; NFL-symbol, wikiproject
Posted: 11.17.16 @ 5:07pm EST; Copyright © 2016

Advertisements

PGA 2015: Tiger, Tiger, Burning Out

22 Jul

“Tyger, Tyger, burning bright,”
Those days are gone but take no flight,
With crowded mantel that others crave,
The Woodsman can revel in bygone rave.

......Tyger.Poem.Wm.Blake.wc.thb

One would not be limb-walking to write that the bloom has now officially gone off Tiger Woods’ rose. He’s in full funk, game all catawampus.

After another dismal showing, this time at the 144th British Open (missed cut), won on Monday by American Zach Johnson by way of a thrilling playoff, it’s been made abundantly clear to even the most Pollyannaish of Woods’ supporters that the seemingly inhuman & unstoppable Tiger of pre-2009, before personal problems befell, is and will never be that same superlative sport star again.

Having been named the PGA Player of the Year as recently as 2013 (7) with five tour victories, at 39 (12.30.75), this era’s greatest golfer seems to’ve had all the air let out of his tires since that awarding and gone completely flat.

Woods has “miles to go” before gracing the senior (Champions (50)) but the way he’s mishandling what used to be a malleable PGA tour it can’t come soon enough for the former wunderkind and would-be Nicklaus (18) – Snead (82) surpasser.

It’s gotten so bad it appears he may be emotionally sabotaging his game from the get go, as evidenced by a post-British comment (“doomed…(by) second swing”), almost willing a Jack & Jill result down the hill, sans the crown lost years ago.

.....Tiger.4.23.9.T.Hipps.Army.wc.thb

With this sad state engulfing Tiger like a heavy fog, missing cuts with regularity of an over-sleeping greenskeeper, attempts by his detractors to deconstruct his tremendous legacy and it’s record of accomplishment (79 PGA / 14 major) have begun in earnest.

The line of attack: Woods wasn’t a truly great golfer as the quality of competition was such that any good golfer could take advantage, rise to the top and stay there for a long, long time. Imagine?

QoC can be a valid line of inquiry. I’ve used it myself for historical comparison. But who’s to say that some champions cannot, to some degree, play a role in shaping or affecting that competition?

On the Woods topic one must consider the real possibility that he and his near suffocating PGA dominance had a negative mental impact on the mind-games of many a potentially starry golfer from 1997 – 2009 (‘13).

Imagine what the average pro in 2000 was telling his wife, family on Monday mornings after a tourney: ‘Helen, you wouldn’t believe this guy, he’s a machine!’

....Nicklaus.J.Dye.9.27.6.FL.wc.thmb

The Golden Bear most certainly had a similar psycho-impact on his peers but arrived on the golf scene (‘58) at a time when competition was famously fierce. But the generations of which Nicklaus was part was arguably more adept at handling pressure than is our own. Early 20th century folk (Depression / WWs), some who grew up around outhouses and horse-drawn transport had a wherewithal we don’t see as much today, not on a broader, societal scale anyway.

Some feel the lucrative endorsement deals in a post-Nicklaus age, in a consumerocracy where golfers act as walking billboards, have played a bigger role in adversely effecting current player performance, i.e., motivation.

While that point holds some merit, to believe it explains Woods near total dominance for a decade that saw a dearth of serious, regular competitors to the Tiger challenge (Mickelson, Singh, Els, etc.), would seem somewhat specious.

The golfers Tiger faced have all, like he, been weaned on competition. A passion for winning won’t wane simply because money‘s flowing in, especially when your own trophy mantel is sporting few pieces, or few of the ‘Wow!’ variety.

And then Tiger had (has) the spiffiest sponsorships deals of anyone and it clearly did not cut into his own drive to win. It may’ve in fact encouraged it.

.....Tiger.7.4.7.wc.M.Burgess.USN.thb

Bottom line: The desire to win is engrained in the brain of every PGA player from the time they handle their first Playskool® putter. Tiger had no monopoly on that emotion.

One would be no nearer to ascending that proverbial tree and it’s limbs of liability by suggesting a fair percentage of those detractors are driven by one or more of the following motives:

1) Prejudice, be it either of the jealousy or racially-based variety;
2) Love of sport: A circumstantially-based belief that Woods partook in the use of performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) in his prime period; or
3) The California-born golfer named Eldrick Tont Woods has conducted himself too often with airs of arrogance, bratty course play and deserves comeuppance.

Whatever the motive, Eldrick’s record of achievement will withstand a battery.

So what to do about his gamey game, getting back in the swing of it?

The tried & trues have been tried and have proven mostly erroneous, so it may be time for Woods to embark upon a new path, venture onto Drastic Highway.

Go on sabbatical, re-charge the batteries, learn to live without golf? He’s young enough to give it a whirl and chance the comeback. Sponsors won’t likey.

...gluten.baked.wc.S03311251.15.thb

Find a new sponsor (Nike), if terms & tact permitting? Maybe marginally relevant to his funk but everything, excepting family and true friends, are subject to review.

Find a new club (religion) or new variety? Born-again PGA’er Bernhard Langer would say it changed his life.

Keep pluggin’ away? Persistence can pay off but then stress is a killer.

Work a change in diet? Bingo.

Woods looks kinda’ haggard these days, even before he tees off.

If he hasn’t, get off the gluten and HFCS. The move is helping millions. Can a wheat-free and low-sugar diet help him bag tourneys again? No promises, but he’ll feel, look a new man, born again, as it were. That’s when new life begins.

“As the old Scotsman said, golf is a humbling game (M.Rooney).” A truth.

A line from the movie Blade Runner (’82): “The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long (J.Turkel).” And Tiger did burn bright.

......macroecono.lamcasinoroyal.wc.2011

Steven Keys
Macro Sport
Photo credits: T.Woods, 7.4.7, M.Burgess, USN, wc.cca; W.Blake, Tyger-poem, wc; T.Woods, wc, T.Hipps, 4.23.9; T.Woods, wc, 7.4.7, M.Burgess; J.Nicklaus, wc, 9.27.6, J.Dye; gluten.baked.spongy, S03311251; macroecono, lamcasinoroyal, wc, 2011.
Posted: 7.22.15 @ 7:22pm; edit 7.23 @ 3:45pm EST
Poem reference: “The Tyger” by Wm Blake, 1794 (“Songs of Experience”)
Copyright © 2015